Talk:Gig economy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Dedicated article discussion[edit]

I'm unclear why this doesn't have a dedicated page and instead redirects to gig worker? Surely there has been a lot of activity around the term, it's history and various use, enough to justify a full page?

Phifty (talk) 01:15, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Doubtful there's enough to say about the term specifically, as opposed to the concept, which has too much WP:OVERLAP with the concept of gig workers to justify separation. —swpbT • go beyond • bad idea 15:01, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Dylan620 talk 00:03, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Created by TonyTheTiger (talk). Self-nominated at 15:40, 5 December 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Gig economy; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

  • Be advised that this article existed in article space for a month and a half in 2018. It was then redirected to temporary work for a year and a half and then gig worker for 4 years. I can find no evidence of a WP:AFD, WP:CSD or WP:PROD in this article's history. I think it should have its own article. The current second sentence explains why redirecting it to gig worker is not sufficient ("The gig economy is composed of corporate entities, workers and consumers"). This is a current WP:VA5 nominee.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 15:44, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.
Overall: Earwig picks up the quotes but not much else. Nice article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 15:04, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]